在法國大東部大區，設有Wi-Fi的飯店

「•鐵路:科爾馬爾車站(Gare de Colmar)連接斯特拉斯堡(30分鐘),巴塞爾(45分鐘),蘇黎世(2小時)和巴黎(TGV約2.5時間)。 •城市交通:老城區可以步行。還提供免費的電動小巴和觀光小火車 • Eguisheim 和 Riquewihr:阿爾薩斯葡萄酒路線沿線的圖畫書般的村莊。從科爾馬爾乘汽車或巴士15～ 20分鐘。」

「酒店位於法國🇫🇷、德國🇩🇪、瑞士🇨🇭邊境地區具有獨特的地理位置優勢，酒店前台服務超讚，熱情、周到. L'hôtel est situé dans la zone frontalière de la France, de l'Allemagne et de la Suisse. Le service de réception de l'hôtel est excellent.」

「百年老建築改造，古典外觀與現代設計交融。地理位置優越，步行可達火車站及老城區。房間精緻，部分帶露台，備品高端。服務周到，早餐豐富有特色。歷史感與舒適度完美平衡的獨特體驗。」

「我們到歐洲自駕遊的旅途中在這裏留下了深刻的美好印象。酒店內裝飾具有法蘭西傳統藝術風格，古樸中流露着浪漫與熱情。前台的帥哥更是給予我們很熱情親切的接待，先讓我們看了房間，介紹了生活設施。房間用品都很乾凈，暖氣也很熱，這對於冬季自駕遊的我們來説很重要。酒店的位置距離商業中心很近，環境幽靜，交通便利。周圍還有大型超市，購物也非常便利。院內有寬敞的停車場，還是免費的，晚上要關閉院落大門，因此給人安全感。我們很喜歡這家酒店，原來訂1天，後來又續訂1天。由於大意，在續訂時我們發生了重複下單的失誤，帥哥為我們及時糾正，避免了損失。 選擇這家酒店，是我們旅途中的一次幸運。祝酒店生意興隆！聖誕快樂！ 4位來自中國北京的旅行者寫於2024年聖誕節前」

「距離斯特拉斯堡火車站步行4分鐘。 它靠近車站，但地處安靜區域。 附近有很多餐廳。 如果您計劃前往科爾馬或巴黎等地旅行，這裡是理想的下榻之所。 雖然飯店年代較久遠，但乾淨整潔，維護良好，員工熱情友善。 步行10分鐘即可到達斯特拉斯堡市中心， 交通便利。」

「我住了三晚。飯店位置非常便利，就在火車站對面。即使深夜抵達也沒關係。飯店裡那部古老的電梯還在使用，一定要體驗一下！前台工作人員都非常友好，我的住宿體驗很愉快。下次來斯特拉斯堡我一定還會選擇這家旅館。 飯店入口晚上11點後關閉，所以如果您要待到很晚，請務必提前了解如何開門。」

「房間很好用，洲際集團旗下四星酒店，USB接口等都特別人性化，燈有特別設計，早餐服務也好，離大教堂和小法蘭西都1-1.2公里之內，地理位置很好，開始以為離火車站遠，750米走走10分鐘。唯一的缺點就是陽枱面向鐵路，我睡眠質量很好，輕微火車聲不影響，晚上火車少，早晨火車多」

「酒店位於斯特拉斯堡附近的小鎮，距離市中心半小時左右車程，因為趕上感恩節聖誕市集開放，酒店價格翻倍，如果按照平時的價格我覺得酒店的環境和服務還是可以接受的。我住的房間裏有全套的廚具，可以自己做飯，家庭出遊不錯的選擇。附近有古老的古建築博物館，有時間可以逛一下。」

「您好,我們在您家的走非常好,我們非常歡迎您,聽着,沒什麼說我會不用擔心我的新夥伴,而是我男朋友柯先生。我們非常感謝您,柯先生」

「AVOID AT ALL COSTS as this hotel is not worth the money or trust from its guests. I stayed at Le Grand Hôtel Strasbourg from October 5–6, 2025 (Room 317). What happened that night was unacceptable for any hotel, let alone a three-star one. At around 2:00 a.m., I was abruptly awakened by loud knocking. The man outside refused to identify himself, only saying, “You called for something; I’m bringing it to you”. I hadn’t requested anything. He refused to give his name, and I couldn’t confirm who he was with no peephole. He then asked, “Are you a Chinese man in Room 317?” I am a Chinese woman travelling alone. When I said no, he replied, “Oh, maybe you exchanged rooms, or maybe someone made a joke” and left. I tried to call reception using the bedside phone, but it was broken. I then used my mobile to call the number on Google Maps; the same man answered, confirming only then that he was a hotel employee. He said a “Chinese man” had called asking for help, said he was in 317, and asked the receptionist to come because he had disabilities. Instead of verifying this request (which in the end turned to be from a guest in ibis hotel), receptionist simply checked the hotel system, read my full name aloud, assumed it was correct because it “looked Chinese”, and came knocking at 2 am. When I asked whether he confirmed the caller’s name, he said, “We don’t usually ask the names of our guests”. He also refused to tell me his own name. Only the next morning did the manager say his name was “Francis”. When I asked for his surname, she replied, “That’s the name he goes by here”. This entire event shows serious failures in safety, professionalism, and privacy: -No night security protocol; staff knock on guests’ doors at 2 a.m. without verification. -Broken in-room phone and no peephole reflect clear safety risks. -The employee failed to confirm the caller’s identity. -He accessed and disclosed my full name aloud, a privacy violation. -His assumption that a Chinese name equals a Chinese man reveals racial and gender discrimination. -He tried to distribute the responsibility to me, someone woken up BY him, instead of apologizing. GOOD NEWS: The manager’s vague answer about his identity shows the hotel's good protection of personal privacy. It's just the privacy had nothing to do with its guests. Because of this, I spent the night feeling unsafe and could not sleep until 4 a.m. I have neurasthenia, and being awakened like this caused serious distress. The next morning, the reception manager admitted that proper protocol requires checking a guest’s name before approaching their room — meaning this employee ignored standard procedure entirely. She kept repeating, “this is the first time this has ever happened to us”. This statement once again showed the amazing corporate culture of this hotel: distributing their responsibility onto innocent guest. She tried to make the incident seem as an isolated case rather than a systemic issue. But if their training were truly professionally standardised, such a mistake could never have happened. The whole thing WAS a systemic problem: poor staff training, lack of supervision, and disregard for privacy and guest safety. The hotel was unable to distinguish between internal and external calls, meaning they can’t verify where a call comes from. If the man at my door had not been an employee, I would have had no way to protect myself. Guests deserve safety, transparency, and respect — not fear, negligence, and discrimination. Until this hotel takes responsibility and implements real safety measures, there will still be danger of another guest being disturbed at 2 am, there will still be invasion of privacy by its staff, and there will still be chances of wasting your money only to get no rest over night and mental distress.」