溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店

溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店的評論

溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店

70 State St, 14614 羅切斯特, 紐約州, 美國查看飯店詳情
溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店
溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店
選擇訂房日期並查詢價格
買貴退差價
1晚

溫德姆羅切斯特市中心飯店的真實房客評論

5.9/10
105 則評論
驗證過的評論
位置6.2
設施5.8
服務5.8
衛生程度6.0
篩選依據:
排序方式:
所有評論(105)
好評(3)
附有照片/影片的評論(2)
負評(4)
Isao Kaku
特大床房(禁菸)
入住於 2025 年 1 月
商務出差
1 則評論
4.5/10
發布於 2025 年 2 月 9 日
너무 낡고 노후함. 호텔로서의 서비스는 전무함. 잠만 잔다면 ok
翻譯
匿名用戶
入住於 2023 年 7 月
其他
2 則評論
5.5/10
發布於 2023 年 8 月 23 日
房間裏有兩處蜘蛛網,酒店在裝修,倒是不吵但是整體環境很差而且有些路還攔起來了 走廊每個轉角都放了把椅子坐了個人,不知道是住客還是什麼人
訪客用戶
入住於 2023 年 7 月
家庭出遊
2 則評論
3.0/10
發布於 2023 年 8 月 31 日
裝修中至 2023-12 早餐還可以,份量很大
原文以 Google 翻譯
匿名用戶
入住於 2023 年 5 月
其他
11 則評論
6.5/10
發布於 2023 年 6 月 6 日
酒店有鋼琴可以提供給住店的客人練琴,設施陳舊,周圍環境不好,價格相對其他酒店便宜。
Haibiandebaicai
入住於 2024 年 3 月
商務出差
142 則評論
7.5/10
發布於 2024 年 4 月 20 日
私自多扣費,體驗感差
訪客用戶
入住於 2023 年 2 月
其他
26 則評論
8.0/10
很好
發布於 2023 年 3 月 12 日
飯店比較舊。真的很舊的電梯。聲音可以從任何地方傳遞
原文以 Google 翻譯
訪客用戶
行動/聽力無障礙1張特大床房間,帶扶手浴缸,無煙
入住於 2025 年 9 月
夫妻/情侶出遊
1 則評論
3.5/10
發布於 2025 年 10 月 20 日
The hotel's elevators were not functioning. The front desk staff was not helpful. The room was run down, and the thermostat didn't work. The staff said they would have someone fix it, but they never did, and I was told there were no additional blankets for the bed. (temp never came above 62 degrees farenheit). Also, I ended up in a 'Handicapped Accessible' room even though I did not request one, and they insisted I had asked for one. Even if I were someone needing a wheelchair, this room would not have actually been accessible. The room was arranged for wider rolling, and the bathroom sink was roll-under, but the shower was a regular bathtub with sides. There were two handle bars, but they were not place in a way that would help someone transfer from a wheelchair to a shower chard (had there been one, which there wasn't). Also the shower head was higher than a short standing person could reach, and there was no hand-held shower head accommodation. I have pictures if anyone wants to see them. Also - and not as critical as an accessible shower - the iron was up so high I could barely reach it, and I'm 5'8". To add insult to injury, I had modified my room reservation within the Trip.com to leave a day earlier than originally booked. I was well-within the cancellation/modification agreed timeline, however Trip.com has said (even after three attempts with different support people) that they could not refund me for the one day I would not be staying because the hotel would not refund a third party. When I asked the hotel, they said that if I didn't stay I (or the third party Trip.com) would not be charged. So WHY is Trip.com refusing to refund me the money for the night I did not stay? I will never use Trip.com again, I will never prepay again, and I certainly will never stay at the Wyndham Rochester again. Not worth the small savings over other hotels and travel companies.
翻譯