斯特拉斯堡有Wi-Fi的飯店

「我住了三晚。飯店位置非常便利，就在火車站對面。即使深夜抵達也沒關係。飯店裡那部古老的電梯還在使用，一定要體驗一下！前台工作人員都非常友好，我的住宿體驗很愉快。下次來斯特拉斯堡我一定還會選擇這家旅館。 飯店入口晚上11點後關閉，所以如果您要待到很晚，請務必提前了解如何開門。」

「位置很好,位於老城區和歐洲議會之間,步行即可到達。夏季該地區食物不多,因爲許多地方因假期關閉或早/晚關閉。然而,酒店本身很乾淨,安靜,設施標準。該地區也很安全。」

「New fantastic hotel near to the center of the city. Sophisticated design, great cosmetic (special thanks for the hear conditioner), big enough room, really good breakfast, silence and comfort. Will recommend it to all my friends who goes to Strasbourg.」

「挺好的，服務也好，位置也不錯，衞生乾淨，不愧是聖誕之都，大堂很有氣氛！一早到了酒店我申請當天吃早餐，第二天睡個懶覺就不起來，問能不能幫忙換一下，前台和餐廳都特別熱情給我換好了！房間能看見斯特拉斯堡大教堂塔尖！」

「優點：新開不久，距離大學很近，離市區不遠，後面有大商場很方便，門口就有電車 缺點：1.前台不正規，就一個小桌子；2.入住要求提供信用卡號、姓名、cvv號，盜刷風險激增，因此一晚上沒睡好，馬上把信用卡鎖掉了；3.房間被子很皺 下次並不是很敢住這家了」

「房間很乾淨，但是太小了。浴室真的很小，用起來太困難了。房間裡有水壺和一些茶和咖啡。我們住宿期間房間裡沒有任何噪音。他們的服務很好，如果你願意的話，每天都會打掃房間。飯店的位置很好，可以在城市裡散步，附近有很多咖啡館和餐廳。早餐很美味有很多選擇。大廳還有咖啡機，可以免費喝咖啡，還有飲水機，3種水。我喜歡這家飯店，但實際上我不想再住在那裡，因為浴室不夠好。也沒有任何風景。」

「在小法蘭西里，雖然周圍都是遊客，但是絲毫沒有被吵到，很舒服的入住。 設施：酒店有4層，電梯到3樓，服務員幫忙搬行李到4樓，退房時候電話也有人來幫助。房間內裝修可以看出比較久遠，木頭有爛掉痕跡但是有感受到在努力保護。窗外風景很好。1樓有spa和做臉。每個房間有一天1小時中心洗澡蒸桑拿時間，但是男女不分開，建議要去的話帶泳衣。 衞生：洗澡和衞生間是分開的。很乾凈。 環境：內部安靜舒適，外部建築物給人的心靈上的寧靜。 服務：從前台到餐廳服務員都很熱情。 ps，早餐其實選擇不算多，但是都很好吃。蛋可以點包括咖啡茶水。」

「AVOID AT ALL COSTS as this hotel is not worth the money or trust from its guests. I stayed at Le Grand Hôtel Strasbourg from October 5–6, 2025 (Room 317). What happened that night was unacceptable for any hotel, let alone a three-star one. At around 2:00 a.m., I was abruptly awakened by loud knocking. The man outside refused to identify himself, only saying, “You called for something; I’m bringing it to you”. I hadn’t requested anything. He refused to give his name, and I couldn’t confirm who he was with no peephole. He then asked, “Are you a Chinese man in Room 317?” I am a Chinese woman travelling alone. When I said no, he replied, “Oh, maybe you exchanged rooms, or maybe someone made a joke” and left. I tried to call reception using the bedside phone, but it was broken. I then used my mobile to call the number on Google Maps; the same man answered, confirming only then that he was a hotel employee. He said a “Chinese man” had called asking for help, said he was in 317, and asked the receptionist to come because he had disabilities. Instead of verifying this request (which in the end turned to be from a guest in ibis hotel), receptionist simply checked the hotel system, read my full name aloud, assumed it was correct because it “looked Chinese”, and came knocking at 2 am. When I asked whether he confirmed the caller’s name, he said, “We don’t usually ask the names of our guests”. He also refused to tell me his own name. Only the next morning did the manager say his name was “Francis”. When I asked for his surname, she replied, “That’s the name he goes by here”. This entire event shows serious failures in safety, professionalism, and privacy: -No night security protocol; staff knock on guests’ doors at 2 a.m. without verification. -Broken in-room phone and no peephole reflect clear safety risks. -The employee failed to confirm the caller’s identity. -He accessed and disclosed my full name aloud, a privacy violation. -His assumption that a Chinese name equals a Chinese man reveals racial and gender discrimination. -He tried to distribute the responsibility to me, someone woken up BY him, instead of apologizing. GOOD NEWS: The manager’s vague answer about his identity shows the hotel's good protection of personal privacy. It's just the privacy had nothing to do with its guests. Because of this, I spent the night feeling unsafe and could not sleep until 4 a.m. I have neurasthenia, and being awakened like this caused serious distress. The next morning, the reception manager admitted that proper protocol requires checking a guest’s name before approaching their room — meaning this employee ignored standard procedure entirely. She kept repeating, “this is the first time this has ever happened to us”. This statement once again showed the amazing corporate culture of this hotel: distributing their responsibility onto innocent guest. She tried to make the incident seem as an isolated case rather than a systemic issue. But if their training were truly professionally standardised, such a mistake could never have happened. The whole thing WAS a systemic problem: poor staff training, lack of supervision, and disregard for privacy and guest safety. The hotel was unable to distinguish between internal and external calls, meaning they can’t verify where a call comes from. If the man at my door had not been an employee, I would have had no way to protect myself. Guests deserve safety, transparency, and respect — not fear, negligence, and discrimination. Until this hotel takes responsibility and implements real safety measures, there will still be danger of another guest being disturbed at 2 am, there will still be invasion of privacy by its staff, and there will still be chances of wasting your money only to get no rest over night and mental distress.」

「距離斯特拉斯堡火車站步行4分鐘。 它靠近車站，但地處安靜區域。 附近有很多餐廳。 如果您計劃前往科爾馬或巴黎等地旅行，這裡是理想的下榻之所。 雖然飯店年代較久遠，但乾淨整潔，維護良好，員工熱情友善。 步行10分鐘即可到達斯特拉斯堡市中心， 交通便利。」

「住了一晚，含早餐。位置離車站很近，所以很容易找到。前台也很年輕，很友善。我也走樓梯，因為電梯不太方便。房間不大，但是乾淨，還可以。沒有便利設施，淋浴的水壓很弱。早餐也很美味。」