法國大東部大區的寵物友善飯店

•鐵路:科爾馬爾車站(Gare de Colmar)連接斯特拉斯堡(30分鐘),巴塞爾(45分鐘),蘇黎世(2小時)和巴黎(TGV約2.5時間)。 •城市交通:老城區可以步行。還提供免費的電動小巴和觀光小火車 • Eguisheim 和 Riquewihr:阿爾薩斯葡萄酒路線沿線的圖畫書般的村莊。從科爾馬爾乘汽車或巴士15～ 20分鐘。

New fantastic hotel near to the center of the city. Sophisticated design, great cosmetic (special thanks for the hear conditioner), big enough room, really good breakfast, silence and comfort. Will recommend it to all my friends who goes to Strasbourg.

我住了三晚。飯店位置非常便利，就在火車站對面。即使深夜抵達也沒關係。飯店裡那部古老的電梯還在使用，一定要體驗一下！前台工作人員都非常友好，我的住宿體驗很愉快。下次來斯特拉斯堡我一定還會選擇這家旅館。 飯店入口晚上11點後關閉，所以如果您要待到很晚，請務必提前了解如何開門。

房間很好用，洲際集團旗下四星酒店，USB接口等都特別人性化，燈有特別設計，早餐服務也好，離大教堂和小法蘭西都1-1.2公里之內，地理位置很好，開始以為離火車站遠，750米走走10分鐘。唯一的缺點就是陽枱面向鐵路，我睡眠質量很好，輕微火車聲不影響，晚上火車少，早晨火車多

位置很方便位，於舊城區，距離小法蘭西 2 分鐘路程。 服務也不錯，設施齊全， 乾淨衞生，房間隔音很好，不用擔心街道噪音。酒店感覺很新。床很舒服，入住/退房過程都很順利。早餐很充足很舒適。總體而言，這是一次舒適的住宿，距離火車站僅 8 分鐘步行路程。值得推薦

距離斯特拉斯堡火車站步行4分鐘。 它靠近車站，但地處安靜區域。 附近有很多餐廳。 如果您計劃前往科爾馬或巴黎等地旅行，這裡是理想的下榻之所。 雖然飯店年代較久遠，但乾淨整潔，維護良好，員工熱情友善。 步行10分鐘即可到達斯特拉斯堡市中心， 交通便利。

您好,我們在您家的走非常好,我們非常歡迎您,聽着,沒什麼說我會不用擔心我的新夥伴,而是我男朋友柯先生。我們非常感謝您,柯先生

酒店位於斯特拉斯堡附近的小鎮，距離市中心半小時左右車程，因為趕上感恩節聖誕市集開放，酒店價格翻倍，如果按照平時的價格我覺得酒店的環境和服務還是可以接受的。我住的房間裏有全套的廚具，可以自己做飯，家庭出遊不錯的選擇。附近有古老的古建築博物館，有時間可以逛一下。

我喜歡我的入住。房間很棒,只是很遺牀邊有美麗的。工作人員很熱情,講解了好處。我照顧了,酒店提供的簽名按摩。他很利,房間很平靜,到來,我們給你一個小包免費歡迎。如果你不想每天清理房間 你早上就在門口上 我很感激 我會在周圍推這家酒店 因爲我對此感到滿意

AVOID AT ALL COSTS as this hotel is not worth the money or trust from its guests. I stayed at Le Grand Hôtel Strasbourg from October 5–6, 2025 (Room 317). What happened that night was unacceptable for any hotel, let alone a three-star one. At around 2:00 a.m., I was abruptly awakened by loud knocking. The man outside refused to identify himself, only saying, “You called for something; I’m bringing it to you”. I hadn’t requested anything. He refused to give his name, and I couldn’t confirm who he was with no peephole. He then asked, “Are you a Chinese man in Room 317?” I am a Chinese woman travelling alone. When I said no, he replied, “Oh, maybe you exchanged rooms, or maybe someone made a joke” and left. I tried to call reception using the bedside phone, but it was broken. I then used my mobile to call the number on Google Maps; the same man answered, confirming only then that he was a hotel employee. He said a “Chinese man” had called asking for help, said he was in 317, and asked the receptionist to come because he had disabilities. Instead of verifying this request (which in the end turned to be from a guest in ibis hotel), receptionist simply checked the hotel system, read my full name aloud, assumed it was correct because it “looked Chinese”, and came knocking at 2 am. When I asked whether he confirmed the caller’s name, he said, “We don’t usually ask the names of our guests”. He also refused to tell me his own name. Only the next morning did the manager say his name was “Francis”. When I asked for his surname, she replied, “That’s the name he goes by here”. This entire event shows serious failures in safety, professionalism, and privacy: -No night security protocol; staff knock on guests’ doors at 2 a.m. without verification. -Broken in-room phone and no peephole reflect clear safety risks. -The employee failed to confirm the caller’s identity. -He accessed and disclosed my full name aloud, a privacy violation. -His assumption that a Chinese name equals a Chinese man reveals racial and gender discrimination. -He tried to distribute the responsibility to me, someone woken up BY him, instead of apologizing. GOOD NEWS: The manager’s vague answer about his identity shows the hotel's good protection of personal privacy. It's just the privacy had nothing to do with its guests. Because of this, I spent the night feeling unsafe and could not sleep until 4 a.m. I have neurasthenia, and being awakened like this caused serious distress. The next morning, the reception manager admitted that proper protocol requires checking a guest’s name before approaching their room — meaning this employee ignored standard procedure entirely. She kept repeating, “this is the first time this has ever happened to us”. This statement once again showed the amazing corporate culture of this hotel: distributing their responsibility onto innocent guest. She tried to make the incident seem as an isolated case rather than a systemic issue. But if their training were truly professionally standardised, such a mistake could never have happened. The whole thing WAS a systemic problem: poor staff training, lack of supervision, and disregard for privacy and guest safety. The hotel was unable to distinguish between internal and external calls, meaning they can’t verify where a call comes from. If the man at my door had not been an employee, I would have had no way to protect myself. Guests deserve safety, transparency, and respect — not fear, negligence, and discrimination. Until this hotel takes responsibility and implements real safety measures, there will still be danger of another guest being disturbed at 2 am, there will still be invasion of privacy by its staff, and there will still be chances of wasting your money only to get no rest over night and mental distress.