What are the ethics and ideologies of self-defence? Self-defence has a variety of legal and ideological cultural histories, shapes and forms (Bowman, 2023; Dodsworth, 2015). Scholars have shown that, in different countries, at different times, the right to self-defence has been heavily allocated to certain subjects (e.g., white, propertied, male) and withheld from others (Light, 2017). Others have shown the extent to which women’s self-defence was a significant element of the first wave of the feminist movement in the UK (Dodsworth, 2019; Godfrey, 2012), and argued that learning how to fight and be aggressive may be an enabling and potentially emancipatory element of physical feminism (McCaughey, 1997). But, as philosopher Elsa Dorlin asks (Dorlin, 2022), is self-defence ethical? Is teaching self-defence ethical, and who can or should teach whom? What should be taught, to whom, and based on what qualifications? Where does self-defence begin and end? Where does the ‘self’ to be defended start and end, and what are the limits of ‘defence’ – the body, the mind, clothing, technology, architecture, or the physical management of space? Ultimately, as philosopher Peter Sloterdijk has argued, almost everything that humans have done to ward off one or another kind of threat might be viewed as self-defence (Sloterdijk, 2013). This symposium starts from the most conventional understanding of ‘self-defence’: as learned, taught and practiced interpersonal, face-to-face, body-to-body skills, training, techniques, tactics, strategies, rationales, outlooks and ideologies. It asks: What are the sociocultural, demographic, physical, emotional, psychological and other dimensions to be considered (e.g., gender, race, class, age, nationality, etc.)?What ideologies does self-defence derive from and feed into? What fantasies, phobias and fears?How is the threat to be defended against imagined, and with what connection to empirically observable reality?How has media affected self-defence discourse and practice – from the classic moral panics of newspapers and TV news, to filmic representations, the internet, CCTV, and gaming?
Our premise is that interpersonal self-defence is a more complicated and controversial ethical, ideological and political matter than it may at first appear.

Information Source: Professor Paul Bowman (Cardiff University) | eventbrite

卡迪夫

英國

正在搜尋The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | School of Journalism, Media and Culture的資訊及門票嗎？Trip.com 樂意為您服務。立即查看關於The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | School of Journalism, Media and Culture的日期、行程及其他資訊，並在參與The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | School of Journalism, Media and Culture之前先訂好實惠又合適的機加酒！Trip.com 還準備了更多類似的精彩活動，當然也包含優惠的機票及飯店組合。立即啟程！

The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | School of Journalism, Media and Culture的日期及行程 | Trip.com

The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | School of Journalism, Media and Culture

The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | Trip.com

探索更多卡迪夫相關的內容

null | Trip.com

看看您好友的想法？分享您的答案就能開始聊天！

卡迪夫城堡

即日可用

歷史建築

Mel2024

一個令人驚歎的城堡和參觀場地是一種享受。充滿了歷史,穿過周圍環境,它不是重複的,一點也不無聊。我絕對喜歡它,非常有趣。我喜歡阿拉伯房間和戰爭避難所。與皇家城堡價格相比,價格合理。我強烈推薦所有年齡段的訪問。工作人員很友好,樂於助人。我喜歡加的夫。與倫敦相比,它是如此令人耳目一新。

加的夫國家博物館

博物館

M43***62

足夠愉快的方式花幾個小時。主要去看畫,但(當然這完全是個人口味的問題)沒有太多搖滾我的船,沒有很多範圍。有些陶器很有趣,但可以更好地展示。一樓的自然歷史部分比預期的更有趣 - 不太&ldquo;乾燥&rdquo;

加的夫灣

沙灘和海岸

AK520

加的夫灣非常方便,離加的夫中央車站非常近,可以坐公交車或從中央車站步行30分鐘,當然可以免費參觀,那裏的場景太棒了,你可以在那裏花幾個小時,毫無疑問。在那裏拍很多照片,那裏有很多商店和餐館和咖啡店,所以一旦累了,可以在那裏喝杯咖啡,坐在海邊旁邊,同時享受咖啡和大海。那裏有不同種類的酒吧和餐廳,從高級到家庭餐廳。那裏也有幾棟歷史建築,那裏有一個現代化的展覽中心。它的外觀設計是如此高科技,你肯定會愛上它。

時間：	Nov 6, 2024 (UTC+0) 結束
地點：	School of Journalism, Media and Culture

The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | School of Journalism, Media and Culture

詳情

投票

您對 The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence 感興趣嗎？

與The Ethics and Ideologies of Self-Defence | School of Journalism, Media and Culture相關

卡迪夫城堡

加的夫國家博物館

加的夫灣